Diagnóstico Del Ictus Agudo Empleando Un Dispositivo Electrónico Portátil (Ipad 2).
Concordancia Interobservador En La Valoración De TC Basal Y Angio-TC.
Palabras clave:
Ictus, poster, seram, iPad, mobileResumen
Objetivos
Nuestro objetivo es validar la utilización de dispositivos portátiles tipo Ipad en el diagnóstico del ictus agudo. En los últimos años, asistimos a un incremento en el uso de los dispositivos electrónicos portátiles en el área médica (1,2) que siguen siendo objeto de trabajos e investigaciones actuales su capacidad para mostrar una imagen de calidad suficiente para permitir diagnósticos radiológicos con buena precisión (3-14). Las tabletas permiten visualizar imágenes radiológicas DICOM e interpretarlas, incorporando herramientas básicas de post-procesado.Son una herramienta útil en el campo de la teleconsulta de emergencia para el diagnóstico en imagen y ya existen estudios que demuestran la fiabilidad de las lecturas en estos dispositivos, principalmente en el ámbito de urgencias (8,9, 11-13), en sospecha de TEP (10, 14) y en el ictus (7, 14).
Especialmente en el ictus agudo es importante obtener un diagnóstico radiológico de manera certera, eficaz y eficiente, ya que el tiempo modifica los criterios de actuación. Es imprescindible realizar estudios de imagen, como la TC-craneal basal (sin contraste intravenoso (TC), y la AngioTC craneal (AngioTC). En el contexto socio-sanitario actual, muchos centros no disponen de radiólogos de presencia física las 24 horas del día, y cada vez se implementan más sistemas de tele-radiología.
Descargas
Citas
- Boonn WW, Flanders AE. Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): survey of personal digital assistant use in radiology. RadioGraphics 2005;25:537–541.
- Michael L. Richardson. Software Aids for Radiologists: Part 2, Essential Apps for Handheld Devices. AJR 2012; 199:W714–W722.
- LaBounty TM, Kim RJ, Lin FY, Budoff MJ, Weinsaft JW, Min JK. Diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomography angiography as interpreted on a mobile handheld phone device. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 May;3(5):482-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2009.11.018.
- Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kang BS. Remote CT reading using an ultramobile PC and web-based remote viewing over a wireless network. J Telemed Telecare. 2012 Jan;18(1):26-31. doi: 10.1258/jtt.2011.110412. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
- Yoshimura K, Nihashi T, Ikeda M, Ando Y, Kawai H, Kawakami K, et al. Comparison of liquid crystal display monitors calibrated with gray-scale standard display function and with γ 2.2 and iPad: observer performance in detection of cerebral infarction on brain CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Jun;200(6):1304-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.9096.
- McNulty JP, Ryan JT, Evanoff MG, Rainford LA. Flexible image evaluation: iPad versus secondary-class monitors for review of MR spinal emergency cases, a comparative study. Acad Radiol. 2012 Aug; 19(8):1023-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.02.021. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
- Mitchell JR, Sharma P, Modi J, Simpson M, Thomas M, Hill MD et al. A smartphone client-server teleradiology system for primary diagnosis of acute stroke. J Med Internet Res. 2011 May 6;13(2):e31. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1732.
- Toomey RJ, Ryan JT, McEntee MF, Evanoff MG, Chakraborty DP, McNulty JP et al. Diagnostic efficacy of handheld devices for emergency radiologic consultation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Feb;194(2):469-74. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3418.
- John S, Poh AC, Lim TC, Chan EH, Chong le R. The iPad tablet computer for mobile on-call radiology diagnosis? Auditing discrepancy in CT and MRI reporting. J Digit Imaging. 2012 Oct;25(5):628-34.
- Johnson PT, Zimmerman SL, Heath D, Eng J, Horton KM, Scott WW et al. The iPad as a mobile device for CT display and interpretation: diagnostic accuracy for identification of pulmonary embolism. Emerg Radiol. 2012 Aug;19(4):323-7. doi: 10.1007/s10140-012-1037-0. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
- Park JB, Choi HJ, Lee JH, Kang BS. An assessment of the iPad 2 as a CT teleradiology tool using brain CT with subtle intracranial hemorrhage under conventional illumination. J Digit Imaging. 2013 Aug;26(4):683-90. doi: 10.1007/s10278-013-9580-0.
- Panughpath SG, Kumar S, Kalyanpur A. Utility of mobile devices in the computerized tomography evaluation of intracranial hemorrhage. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013 Jan;23(1):4-7. doi: 10.4103/0971-3026.113610.
- Mc Laughlin P, Neill SO, Fanning N, Mc Garrigle AM, Connor OJ, Wyse G. et al. Emergency CT brain: preliminary interpretation with a tablet device: image quality and diagnostic performance of the Apple iPad. Emerg Radiol. 2012 Apr;19(2):127-33. doi: 10.1007/s10140-011-1011-2. Epub 2011 Dec
- Tewes S, Rodt T, Marquardt S, Evangelidou E, Wacker FK, von Falck C. Evaluation of the use of a tablet computer with a high-resolution display for interpreting emergency CT scans. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2013; Rofo. Nov;185(11):1063-9. Epub 2013 Jul 26. DOI:10.1055/s-0033-1350155
- Pexman JH, Barber PA, Hill RJ et al. Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Scorre (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke. AJNR Am j Neuroradiol. 2001 Sept: 22(8): 1534-42.
-Gupta AC, Schaefer PW, Chaudhry ZA, Leslie-Mazwi TM, Chandra RV, González RG, et al. Interobserver reliability of baseline noncontrast CT Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score for intra-arterial stroke treatment selection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012 Jun;33(6):1046-9. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A2942. Epub 2012 Feb 9.
- Olga Finlayson, Verity John, Robert Yeung, Dar Dowlatshahi, Peter Howard, Liying Zhang, et al. Interobserver Agreement of ASPECT Score Distribution for Noncontrast CT, CT Angiography, and CT Perfusion in Acute Stroke. Stroke. 2013;44:234-36.
- SB. Coutts, AM. Demchuk, PA. Barber, WY. Hu, JE. Simon, AM. Buchanet al. Interobserver variation of ASPECTS in real time. Stroke. 2004;35(5):e103.
- Wardlaw JM, Mielke O. Early signs of brain infarction at CT: observer reliability and outcome after thrombolytic treatment-systematic review. Radiology. 2005 May;235(2):444-53.
- Hacke W, Kaste M, Fieschi C, Toni D, Lesaffre E, von Kummer R, et al. Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator for acute hemispheric stroke. The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS). JAMA. 1995;274(13):1017-25.
- María Alonso de Leciñana y Exuperio Díez Tejedor (coordinación). Protocolo para el tratamiento endovascular en el ictus isquémico agudo. Documento de consenso. Comunidad de Madrid.
- Camargo EC, Furie KL, Singhal AB, Roccatagliata L, Cunnane ME, Halpern EF, et al. Acute brain infarct: detection and delineation with CT angiographic source images versus nonenhanced CT scans. Radiology. 2007;244(2):541-48.
-Bradley Efron. Nonparametric Estimates of Standard Error: The Jackknife, the Bootstrap and Other Methods. Biometrika Vol. 68, No. 3 (Dec., 1981), pp. 589-599.
-Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
-Lipsitz SR, Parzen M, Fitzmaurize GM, Klar N. A two-stage logistic regression model for analyzing inter-rater agreement. Psychometrika 2003; 68: 289-98
-Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10.
